now that kac isn't dead should we not all donate to kigen
either our support (help with coding those who manage) or our money?
KAC not dead
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 11:08 am
- Location: Right behind you....
- Contact:
Re: KAC not dead
Having helping hands in developing KAC would prove more useful than money. However, any help that can be provided would be very helpful. 

Re: KAC not dead
You made the right decision, R-E-S-P-E-C-T
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 11:08 am
- Location: Right behind you....
- Contact:
Re: KAC not dead
Yes, I felt that making such rash decisions based on the actions of a few were the worst thing I could have done. So, again, I apologize to everyone for that.
I will be continuing developing KAC for all those who have used it over the years.
So I'd like to ask for the everyone's continued support. I hope that you all can accept my apology.
I will be continuing developing KAC for all those who have used it over the years.

So I'd like to ask for the everyone's continued support. I hope that you all can accept my apology.
Re: KAC not dead
sure we can kigen, and lets find some co.coder to work with you on this great project =D
but kigen how about make so all the server's running the plugin report to master banlist now ?
i know you have your kigen-ac-pri.smx that can do that, just a thought is it possible?
but kigen how about make so all the server's running the plugin report to master banlist now ?
i know you have your kigen-ac-pri.smx that can do that, just a thought is it possible?

-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 11:08 am
- Location: Right behind you....
- Contact:
Re: KAC not dead
Its possible to have all servers report their bans to the master server. The problem is that it isn't trust-able.
And I'm not going to be releasing a closed source SM plugins. While I do feel I am correct on the matter of if plugins are derivatives it would only result in hardship for the end-users. As BALIOPAN stated: http://kigenac.com/viewtopic.php?p=4612#p4612 If I were to release a closed source version he would do everything he could to break its functionality with SourceMod.
And I'm not going to be releasing a closed source SM plugins. While I do feel I am correct on the matter of if plugins are derivatives it would only result in hardship for the end-users. As BALIOPAN stated: http://kigenac.com/viewtopic.php?p=4612#p4612 If I were to release a closed source version he would do everything he could to break its functionality with SourceMod.
Re: KAC not dead
there goes that dream away =/ but ok i understand clearly kigen,
kac should have been a metamod source plugin then (from start)
imagine how many steamid's you would have had banned =D
kac should have been a metamod source plugin then (from start)
imagine how many steamid's you would have had banned =D

Re: KAC not dead
Even closed source plugins can be reversed engineered, it's still not safe.twozcar wrote:kac should have been a metamod source plugin then (from start)
Re: KAC not dead
That's why code obfuscation, string encoding, anti-debugging, and symbol stripping exists. It won't completely stop reverse engineering but hopefully it will discourage all but the most determined reverse engineers from understanding how it works.asherkin wrote:Even closed source plugins can be reversed engineered, it's still not safe.twozcar wrote:kac should have been a metamod source plugin then (from start)